nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.36 1-12
生成式人工智能虚假信息的刑法规制研究
基金项目(Foundation): 江苏省社会科学基金项目(23FXC007)
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
投稿时间: 2026-05-20
投稿日期(年): 2026
修回时间: 2026-06-23
终审时间: 2026-06-24
终审日期(年): 2026
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2026-06-15
出版时间: 2026-06-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

生成式人工智能的商业化应用显著降低了虚假信息生成与传播的成本,相关风险呈现规模化、隐秘化特征,对传统刑法理论与规制体系形成多重挑战,集中体现为责任主体界定困难、因果关系因算法黑箱难以认定、主观罪过认定缺乏判断标准。当前处于弱人工智能阶段,应采纳“限制肯定说”,将刑事责任归属于技术开发者、服务提供者与终端使用者,不赋予生成式人工智能刑事主体资格,同时明确虚假信息传播环节三方主体的刑事责任。以危险现实化理论重构因果关系判断规则,区分虚假信息自动生成与被动生成场景,分别适用直接现实型与间接现实型路径。以新过失论为核心,明确不同主体的注意义务体系,妥当认定主观过错,避免责任真空与归责失衡。通过理论重构与类型化规制,实现对生成式人工智能虚假信息的有效治理,兼顾风险防控与技术创新发展。

Abstract:

The commercial application of generative artificial intelligence has significantly reduced the costs of generating and disseminating disinformation, with associated risks exhibiting characteristics of scalability and concealment.This poses multiple challenges to traditional criminal law theory and regulatory frameworks, which are manifested primarily in three aspects: the difficulty in identifying responsible subjects, the challenge in establishing causality due to the algorithmic black box, and the lack of clear standards for determining subjective culpability.Given that the current stage is weak artificial intelligence, the limited affirmative theory should be adopted, attributing criminal liability to technology developers, service providers, and end-users rather than conferring criminal subject qualification upon generative artificial intelligence itself.Concurrently, the criminal liability of the three categories of subjects in the disinformation dissemination chain should be clarified.The danger actualization theory should be employed to reconstruct the rules for causality determination, distinguishing between scenarios of automatic generation and passive generation of disinformation, with the direct actualization type and indirect actualization type paths applied respectively.Centered on the new theory of negligence, the duty of care system for different subjects should be clarified, subjective fault properly determined, and liability vacuums and attribution imbalances avoided.Through theoretical reconstruction and typological regulation, effective governance of disinformation generated by generative artificial intelligence can be achieved, while balancing risk prevention and control with technological innovation and development.

参考文献

[1] 世界经济论坛.Global Risks Report 2025[EB/OL].(2025-01-15)[2026-04-08].https://cn.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/.

[2] 陈小彪,尹杰辉.生成式人工智能虚假信息犯罪风险分类与分层治理[J].昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版),2026,26(1):1-11.

[3] 衣俊霖.数字孪生时代的法律与问责:通过技术标准透视算法黑箱[J].东方法学,2021(4):77-92.

[4] 陈伟,向珉希.生成式人工智能背景下犯罪主观评价的异变与应对[J].上海法学研究,2023,9(1):1-18.

[5] 李凌,白硕扬,熊思琪.生成式人工智能主体资质的本体论辨析[J].中北大学学报(社会科学版),2025,41(4):76-82.

[6] 刘霜,祁敏.生成式人工智能的刑事归责困境及其纾解:基于功能责任论的立场[J].甘肃社会科学,2025(5):146-155.

[7] 孙道萃.人工智能刑法主体地位的积极论:兼与消极论的答谈[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022,28(4):216-229.

[8] 孙运梁.危险的现实化理论在我国的司法运用[J].国家检察官学院学报,2020,28(1):19-34.

[9] Morris M R,Sohl-dickstein J,Fiedel N,et al.Position:Levels of AGI for operationalizing progress on the path to AGI[C]//Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning.Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,2024,235:36308-36321.

[10] 刘宪权.生成式人工智能的发展与刑事责任能力的生成[J].法学论坛,2024,39(2):18-28.

[11] 刘宪权.关于人工智能时代刑事责任主体演变理论研究的再辨析[J].法学,2025(9):82-94.

[12] 储陈城,魏培林.生成式人工智能犯罪中研发者刑事责任的认定:以ChatGPT为例[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2023,37(9):103-113.

[13] 黄明儒,刘方可.生成式人工智能的刑事犯罪风险与刑法应对[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2024,39(3):69-79.

[14] 袁彬,薛力铭.生成式人工智能的刑法规制问题研究[J].河北法学,2024,42(2):140-159.

[15] 郝炜.人工智能行政执行场景的行政法调控[J].行政法学研究,2023(5):156-166.

[16] 龚鹏程,傅成璐.生成式人工智能虚假信息的刑事风险与法律应对[J].江苏警官学院学报,2024,39(3):64-71.

[17] 姚伊霖.论生成式人工智能内容安全风险的刑事归责体系[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2026,59(1):57-65.

[18] 张秋芳,段誉宗.生成式人工智能的刑事风险及刑法应对[J].中原工学院学报,2024,35(5):59-64.

[19] 刘艳红.生成式人工智能的三大安全风险及法律规制:以ChatGPT为例[J].东方法学,2023(4):29-43.

[20] 姚佳.生成式人工智能服务提供者的注意义务[J].法学论坛,2026,41(3):17-31.

基本信息:

中图分类号:D924.1

引用信息:

[1]江耀炜,顾霆慧.生成式人工智能虚假信息的刑法规制研究[J].梧州学院学报,2026,36(03):1-12.

基金信息:

江苏省社会科学基金项目(23FXC007)

投稿时间:

2026-05-20

投稿日期(年):

2026

修回时间:

2026-06-23

终审时间:

2026-06-24

终审日期(年):

2026

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2026-06-15

出版时间:

2026-06-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文